Saturday, March 14

The publicist Steph Jones was accused of filtering text messages from a former partner to New York Times. Stephanie J/LinkedIn

The star publicist, Stephanie Jones, was vilified last year for “filtering” the texts of her former employee, which revealed the alleged plot to rub Blake Lively, to New York Times, supposedly to punish the employee for planning to steal customers.

But Page Six has Goths of a summons that shows that Jones, who represented Scooter Braun and Tom Brady, among others, did not plant the messages to bury his partner Flack, but in reality he was ordered to deliver the texts by a court.

Jones and his company, Jonesworks, represented the co -star of “Itmines With Us”, Justin Baldoni, and his production company, Wayfarer Studios. Jonesworks Partner, Jen Abel, handling her account.

Jen Abel’s text revealed the supposed plot to defame Blake Lively in the press. Vivien Killilea/Getty images for Alex and her

When a story of Blockbuster Times came out, stating that Abel and Baldoni had prepared a plot to discredit their co -star animated below their statements that they mistreated her on the set (Whiso has Storuss Taatages she had was Woning to Tomas Scaruss.

In one of a large number of demands and counters that have emerged since the story was published, Baldoni said that as his dispute with Lively began arriving in the press in August last year, the relationship between Andbel deteriorated quickly, “seizing his phone and marching from the Jonesworks Los Angeles office.”

Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman later said: “Mrs. Jones became the communications of the telephone that took her own partner.”

Justin Baldoni headquarters to his former publicist, Jones Gregory Pace/Shuttersock

The lawsuit also said that Jones feared that Abel would try to hunt other Jonesworks customers.

But Thors Day, Jones presented an answer claiming that he delivered the texts just because he received a summons. (Page six has reviewed the citation).

It is not yet clear how the texts did it from the people who served the citation to the times.

Jones’ response states: “First, there was no escape … the information occurred in accordance with a citation. Willfarer’s Willfarer de Wayfarer avoids this reality to advance his advertising in search of a leakage narrative, but they cannot change the citation.”

The case is expected to reach the courtroom at some time next year.

]

Olivia White

© 2017-2026 Newsbuzzus. All Rights Reserved.

Exit mobile version