Prince Harry was dramatically escorted from his hearing in the Superior Court of London on Wednesday after one of his supporters seemed to interrupt the procedures.
The Duke of Sussex, 40, was tasks outside the court of the court for a entourage of bodyguard after a 50 -year -old woman shouted in support of royalty.
The woman in question had initially attracted attention when she was late for the Court to witness Harry and her legal team try to recover the security protection of the United Kingdom financed by taxpayers.
After her arrival of late, the woman continued repeatedly causing a scene in the quiet court of the court moving in her seat, playing with her two cell phones and moving through a notebook.
The feature film Harry, the feature film, David Langdown, 57, was seen maintaining their attention to women in case their actions intensify, according to the Daily Mail.
Langdown and his associate were seen later escorting the founder of Invictus Games outside the room in the Royal Courts of Justice, ensuring that the woman did not approach the Prince.
As a tense visible that Harry passed it, the woman shouted: “I support you, Prince Harry.”
“If you are members of the press, you are the reason why it is not in England,” he also heard it say in the court’s public gallery.
The woman was directed immediately by the member of Security, after which Harry and her bodyguards returned to resume the private part of the audience.
The publication has communicated with Harry’s representatives to comment.
The duration of the procedure on Wednesday, Harry’s legal team told the Court that he and his wife, Meghan Markle, “felt forced” to retreat from their roles as older members of the royal family.
The Sussexes “wanted to continue with their duties in support of the deceased queen as members of the royal family funded by private,” Harry’s lawyer, Shaheed Fatima Kc, told the court.
Harry’s team also insisted that a formal process never Tok Place before he and his wife were stripped of public funded protection.
His safety “does not seem to have been discussed in any formal ravec [Royal and VIP Executive Committee] Meeting, “Harry’s lawyer told the court.
Instead, there was a meeting at Buckingham Palace on January 27, 2020 to discuss the matter.
Harry’s lawyer said that the Royal Executive Committee and VIP (RAVEC) “diverted” from its standard process and could not present the appropriate documentation explaining its decision to strip Harry of protection privileges.
His legal team also said that the fugitive prince was “indicated for a different, unjustified and lower treatment” and offered less protection than others in the “other VIP category.”
Duke’s lawyers added that the United Kingdom’s treatment was “illegal and unfair” and warned “the impact on the United Kingdom reputation of a successful attack” against him.
At one point in the audience, Harry seemed to be irritated while playing his pen before pulling a facial expression with disbelief.
The youngest son of King Charles also complained not to feel safe enough to return to his homeland with his wife and two children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, because it is too dangerous. “
]