In an impressive reprimand for the activist judges, the Supreme Court and the 4th circuit on Monday they gave the President Trump a legal trick of hat, affirming his authority to protect the United States from foreign threats and push the judiciary again to him.
These three decisions that contain the law of alien enemies enemies, a deportation of MS-13 and government transparency-from the government serve as a powerful repudiation of the judicial overreach that has sought to observe the Trump agenda.
First, the Supreme Court criticized the brakes on the judge of the DC District Court, James Boasberg, and the expedited train deportation, Aragua’s thugs, and other alien enemies of Aragua.
The president has an almost limit power to eliminate foreign threats that are considered an invasion or incursion, under the terms of the alien enemies law.
On Monday, the Court made it clear that the challenges to such stirred can only come through individual habit requests, not stories of class action.
This means that Trump can continue to send dangerous illegal immigrants without the orders of the blanket of the dishonest judges that stirred the works.
In a separate ruling, the president of the Supreme Court John Roberts intervened to prevent a lower court from demanding the immediate return of an alleged Gangatil of MS-13 of El Salvador, where he is detained in a notorious mega prison.
The order was short, but the message was clear: the courts cannot be interfered with when the Executive acts to quell a threat of public security, even when an “administrative error” sends the sport to the wrong country.
Roberts’ high temporal pointed to Trump’s position that foreign policy and national security are the responsibility of the Executive.
A court does not reach the actions of the seconds of a second or demand negotiations with foreign powers to recover an individual who considered himself deportable years ago.
Completing the triumph, the 4th circuit ruled that Trump’s surveillance team can access government data to detect fraud and waste.
The court said that the plaintiffs, including five public employee unions that were presented to block the release of information from several federal departments, did not present tests of concrete injury and that Trump probably wins for merit.
The ruling immediately reinstated the Doge probe.
It was a victory for transparency and a decisive blow for the attempts of the judges to protect bureaucrats from the president’s promise to control government swelling.
These victories followed an unprecedented judicial assault on Trump’s second term.
The activist judges, the Boasberg head among them, have been shooting precautionary measures as confetti, not only questioning Trump’s authority, but also trying to sit in his chair of the Oval office.
Despite all the left of the left about Trump as a “fascist dictator”, it is the Judiciary who has been twisting the Constitution and the rule of law to undermine his agenda.
Article II gives the President the almost unilateral control over foreign policy and national security.
Imagine whether every drone stik needed a judge is fine, or worse, if the courts ordered the military to bomb anyone.
Ridiculous, right?
However, that is exactly what the judges of the Thesis District Court have been trying to do.
It is Trump’s work deporting national security threats; The courts do not have business playing the border police.
Boasberg is the poster child of these nonsense.
Now he is pressing the lawyers of the Department of Confirmation for not instantly decoding his illegal and murky orders to stop a complex deportation operation.
The wanted planes turned around the flight, as if he was directing an action movie.
Meanwhile, the Judiciary can happen for months in cases that stop the Trump agenda.
With only four years to deliver, this double standard is not just unfair, he is a democracy murderer.
Monday’s decisions are not partisan; They are mainly.
The President, Any The president has national security and directs the executive branch.
Still over low heat is the Circus Mahmoud Khalil.
This graduate student of Columbia states that his deportation is a violation of the first amendment, but he does not buy it: it is not about freedom of expression, but to support Hamas, a designated foreign terrorist organization.
Khalil not only despotric; He alleges that he organized support for Hamas, intimidated Jewish students and a song in forms of immigration.
The first amendment does not cover that, nor should it do it.
He is crying martyrdom while his pregnant wife waits, but he is the one who drags his losing argument.
While Khalil’s merits have not yet been completely litigated, writing is on the wall that will be torn off.
There is a precedent of the firm Supreme Court: in December 2024, the expansive discretionary powers of the Secretary of State to revoke the previously approved visas reaffirmed unanimously.
All these judicial victories point to an undeniable truth: Trump was right and the activist judges were wrong.
On Tuesday, he won an additional victory in the Supreme Court when the order of a district judge that required the restoration of 16,000 workers Trump had tried to shoot increased.
Perhaps the Judiciary finally seizes its limits.
All but some judges of the District Court will make these decisions seriously, and purchases in the forum, the orders nationwide and the intrusion in the authority of article II will stop.
Trump has the mandate, and the muscle, to protect the United States from gangs, terrorists and scammers.
Courts need to leave the taking of power and let them do their job.
The rule of law is back, and wears a red hat.
Andrew Cherkassky and Katie Cherkassky are military veterans, former federal prosecutors and current criminal defense lawyers. They are authors of the book “Woke Warriors”.
]